... how the study works
This one is different
Designing a comprehensive study can be challenging. Many studies on workflow efficiency tend to evaluate the frequency of certain methods used within an organization, with the assumption that the most frequently used methods are the most effective. However, the validity of this assumption is questionable.
Our study adopts a two-phase approach to address this issue. Initially, we examine the workflow itself. We use 32 method-independent questions aimed at identifying signs of either poor or efficient workflow, such as multitasking, desynchronization, and delays. These questions provide an objective assessment and benchmark of your current situation. They can be answered by yourself, or for better results by up to 10-15 of your employees or colleagues.
Our study adopts a two-phase approach to address this issue. Initially, we examine the workflow itself. We use 32 method-independent questions aimed at identifying signs of either poor or efficient workflow, such as multitasking, desynchronization, and delays. These questions provide an objective assessment and benchmark of your current situation. They can be answered by yourself, or for better results by up to 10-15 of your employees or colleagues.
The second phase of our study encompasses the entire organization. We inquire about specific details of the organization, including its size, industry, and maturity level, as well as its relative success. Additionally, we gather information on the duration and types of methods employed.
This approach enables us to draw clear correlations between organizational specifics and method usage, ultimately relating these factors to workflow efficiency and overall success.
